Objectives of Lecture:
Positional Accuracy comes down to numbers.
Are the coordinates for the data close (enough) to the "correct location"?
Total error is the deviation between a position and a position considered to be true.
From graphic material to coordinate system: the direct approach
· Affine: To translate, simply add (subtract) from
X and Y; to scale multiply (either by the same value or by differential
scales (removes a tilt from an airphoto, often, but not always...);
rotation involves cross products.
alternatives to affine: projective (removes "barrel"
distortion based on distance from a focal point (deals with lens
distortions); higher order equations (usually impractical); piecewise
transformations
ONLY transforms into original projection of graphic material,
really
Ground control: Registration involves transforming the
coordinates of some collection of data into a desired coordinate
system. This is usually based on having a key to the transformation
by identifying some set of points ("control") on both
sources. Some systems (eg. ARC/INFO) build this into the process
immediately. I disagree, since I think the original space is
needed to perform quality control, then transform later (with
more ability to select how it happens)
How many points? ARC suggests 4, barely enough to cross-check
an affine! 16 or 20?
Least squares: (regression) Compute transformation between the
input X,Ys and the desired "control" values that minimizes
the squared deviations. R2 measure of goodness of fit, distances
(variances) of the residuals are interesting too.
Outliers: regression can be affected (sometimes heavily)
by some single bad value. Common method: examine outliers, remove
points, refit equation
"Robust" Alternative: Least-Median Squares (can
be up to 50% contaminated)
Version of 4 February 2004