Geography 460: GIS Analysis


Course Objectives

Geography 460 covers the theory and application of computerized geographic information systems (GIS). It combines an overview of general principles of GIS and practical experience in the analytical use of spatial information. It can be taken as an introduction (a bit challenging one) or as a way to deepen already established understanding, or as a way to add GIS techniques to an existing environmental discipline. The lectures cover a comprehensive overview of the analytical treatment of geographic information, following the organization of a textbook written by the instructor. The practical component involves the use of an analytical software package, leading to a project experience. Lab exercises are interspersed with discussion events to connect the practical material to broader practice. Web resources will provide lecture notes, exercise materials, discussion materials and sources for geographic information and analysis at UW and around the world. [See detailed statement of Objectives]


Each student will be required to apply computer tools to an issue requiring spatial analysis, some of it outside of class hours. This course is designed for a broad range of students, but each student should have some exposure to the procedures used to make maps and some introduction to the use of spatial information. Geography students should have Geog. 360 (Principles of Cartography) or its equivalent such as surveying, site analysis for landscape architects, or field courses in geology and forestry. A multi-disciplinary mix of students helps demonstrate the multi-disciplinary nature of GIS applications.


Assignments

This course provides an integrated sequence, where the lectures, the readings, and the practical component are tightly connected. It is quite important to keep up with all the elements. There are three types of assignments, noted in the schedule: practical exercises with the software package (Ex.), discussions (D), and a project. Due dates mean the start of class or section meeting. The fourth component is an Exam.

The detailed schedule of all assignments is found in the Labs page referenced everywhere in this site. See also the Lab Policy statement and TA information.

Exercises

The practical exercises provide a way to acquire skills in using GIS software and to apply the course concepts to real data. Exercises are due at the the date announced (usually at least a week after the relevant lab sessions). Exercises are intended to develop skills, not to evaluate your learning. The teaching assistants will introduce each exercise in lab sessions and provide additional assistance in office hours. Exercises submitted in time will be returned within one week. Exercises judged insufficient will be returned with notes on what elements could be remedied.

   DUE DATE
 Ex. 1 Introduction to ArcMap and Measurement Frameworks  15/16 Oct.
 Ex. 2 Attribute operations  29/30 Oct.
 Ex. 3 Map Comparisons and Overlay  6/7 Nov.
 Ex. 4 Buffers and distances 12/13 Nov.
 Ex. 5 Neighborhood and surface operations 14 Nov.


There will be one overall grade assigned for the exercise component of the class. This grade will "count" for 30% of the whole course. It will provide an assessment of the learning outcomes from the lab component with some consideration of the completeness of the assignments. This grade will reflect more than simple completion of the exercises, the goal is comprehension of the critical choices involved in using the techniques. However, not completing all the assignments will be strongly penalized.

Rough grading guidelines:

A: outstanding comprehension of lab material, strong facility with the software
A- (3.7): good comprehension of lab material, minor weaknesses
B+ (3.3): reasonable comprehension of lab material
B (3.0): adequate comprehension of lab material, all assignments complete
B- (2.7): adequate comprehension, but some assignments incomplete
C: (2.0): difficulties in comprehension or major trouble with completion
D: (1.0): one assignment not submitted in first instance
F: (0.0): two or more assignments not submitted in first instance

Timing: When returning Ex.3 (around 15 November), the TAs will issue a provisional exercise grade based on exercises complete at that time. All exercises are due prior to the Exam. At the Exam on 24 November, a provisional exercise grade will be distributed. After that, all questions about the exercises and the completion of late exercises will be taken up ONLY with the instructor. The TAs will move on to focus exclusively on Projects.


Discussion assignments: general rules

There are four discussion events (D0 - D3) planned, each with specific expectations in the individual assignment. They will consist generally of a lab meeting when students will discuss a range of different examples on a given theme. For some discussion events, all students will be part of a multi person team assigned to cover one source or one "case" of GIS application. Each discussion team will prepare their presentation (overheads, examples, a one or two page "briefing paper" summarizing the group's position/conclusions). This material is due at the discussion event for your section. In other events, there will be an individual essay due at the discussion event. For D1-D3, there is a need for preparation prior to the event.

D0 is ungraded. The D1 and D2 will be graded, each counting for 5% of the course grade. The material for D3 will be a component of the project report, with grading integrated in the project.

Students who do not join a discussion team or miss the discussion meeting will have the opportunity to make up the discussion assignment by submitting a three-four page essay on the topic covered in the discussion. This will involve a lot more work. (See instructor (not TA) for specific arrangements for each discussion event.)


Project assignment

The project is intended to provide a more developed sequence of understanding an application through direct experience. It provides an opportunity to demonstrate your learning of the exercise component of the course. The project is marked by a set of milestones to ensure that things operate smoothly.

A portion of the project is an evaluation of the data sources used by your team. Individuals will pick one source and prepare to present the institutional background in Discussion 3. This element of the project will be graded individually (5% of total grade). The due date is with the final project submission, but the discussion event is a time to present and develop your treatment.

[Full description]


Exam

The exam will occur on 24 November with a practical component in the Lab sections of 24/25 November. The exam will cover the material in the text, the exercises, and practical work of the class. There will be a review session on 21 November to answer questions in an open forum. The one-hour exam will cover materials from the lectures and text; it will consist of short answers, definition questions, and some longer questions. This component will comprise about 60% of the exam grade (which is 25% of the course grade). One element of the exam will involve computer work in the Lab. The lab sessions of 24/25 November are allocated for this purpose. Please attend your section, to ensure availability of machines. We expect you to perform the computer-based portion of the exam in the lab section meeting, then to write your answers to the questions (on your own!) by 4:00 PM on 25 November.

Students with schedule conflicts should talk to the instructor as soon as the conflict is known. Thanksgiving travel will not be considered a valid reason unless extreme hardship can be documented.


Course Grading

Grades will reflect overall performance in the course, with the four components (exercises, discussions, project and exam) receiving different weight:

  Component  Weight   Notes
 Exercises 30% Individual; See above
 Discussions 10% D1 groups; D2 indiv.
 Exam 25% Individual
 Project 35% Group & individual

Grades will be assigned according to the following interpretation:

2.0 minimally adequate

2.5 somewhat better than minimal
3.0 serious engagement with course, adequate performance ("B")
3.5 commendable (A/B)
3.7 meritorious (A-)
4.0 superlative ("A")

There are no quotas on distribution of grades [no fixed mean; no presumption that all students MUST "pass"; no distributional "curve"; no upper limit on 4.0 grades]. The instructor and the TAs want all students to do as well as they can. All calculated grades of 3.9 will be rounded up to 4.0.


Index from Here: Learning Objectives and Social Contract | Description of Lab Policies | Project assignment | Schedule of Lectures | Labs and Due Dates | ArcView help and scripts | How to reach us
Version of 30 September 2003